Category: FAQs

The California Lemon Law has undergone significant changes, particularly in the area of discovery, which went into effect on January 1, 2025. Discovery is a critical phase in litigation where parties exchange information through written questions, document production, and depositions. Under previous law, discovery could begin soon after the lawsuit was served, allowing both sides to prepare for trial while engaging in settlement negotiations. The new law, however, imposes strict limitations on discovery during the initial months of a case.

Key Changes to the Discovery Process

The new law introduces several procedural hurdles that both plaintiffs and defendants must navigate, delaying traditional discovery until certain conditions are met.

1. Mandatory Initial Disclosures (Within 60 Days)

All parties are now required to exchange initial disclosures within 60 days of the defendant filing an answer or other responsive pleading. These disclosures include key documents and information, such as:

• Vehicle sales or lease agreements
• Repair records
• Warranty details
• Communications with the manufacturer regarding the defect
• Information related to vehicle financing and market value

2. Limited Early Depositions (Within 120 Days)

Within 120 days of the defendant filing an answer, limited depositions may be conducted, restricted to:

• The plaintiff
• The defendant (or the most qualified representative if the defendant is a corporation)
• Each deposition is capped at two hours and limited to predefined topics related to the vehicle’s service and warranty history.

3. Mandatory Mediation (Within 150 Days)

Before full discovery can commence, parties must schedule and participate in a mediation within 150 days of the defendant’s response. Both sides must attend, either in person or remotely, and costs are equally shared (though recoverable by the plaintiff as part of a settlement or judgment).

Discovery Stay Until Mediation Concludes

With limited exceptions, the new law places a hold on all additional discovery, such as broader depositions, interrogatories, and document requests, until mediation has been completed. If mediation fails to resolve the case, standard discovery procedures resume, including:

• Additional depositions of the plaintiff and defendant
• Expanded questioning on warranty policies and repair procedures
• Access to manufacturer records related to defect evaluations and service bulletins

Consequences for Noncompliance

Failure to adhere to these new discovery rules comes with strict penalties, including:

• Financial Sanctions: Attorneys may be fined between $1,500 and $2,500 for noncompliance with document production or deposition rules.
• Dismissal of Claims: Plaintiffs who repeatedly fail to comply may see their case dismissed without prejudice, meaning they must restart the lawsuit process.
• Evidentiary Sanctions Against Manufacturers: If manufacturers fail to comply, they may be barred from introducing key evidence at trial to dispute vehicle defects.

What This Means for Consumers and Manufacturers

These changes add new procedural steps for consumers seeking relief under the Lemon Law, making it essential to be well-prepared before filing a lawsuit. Plaintiffs must now gather extensive documentation in advance, and both sides must participate in mediation before engaging in full discovery.

For manufacturers, these changes provide a structured timeline to evaluate claims and potentially resolve disputes earlier in the process. However, the risk of evidentiary sanctions for noncompliance underscores the importance of timely and thorough document production.

Conclusion

California’s new Lemon Law discovery rules significantly alter how claims are litigated, placing a greater emphasis on early disclosure and mediation. While these changes aim to streamline the resolution process, they also introduce new challenges that consumers and manufacturers alike must navigate carefully. Anyone considering a Lemon Law claim should consult with an experienced attorney, like Lemon Law Attorney Sotera Anderson, to ensure compliance with the new legal framework and protect their rights under California law.

I am excited to share that I am now offering mediation services with a specialized focus on lemon law cases. With 24 years of legal experience and over 15 years handling lemon law disputes, I bring a unique and comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by both sides of these cases.

During my career, I have had the privilege of representing both car manufacturers and consumers, spending approximately half of my lemon law practice advocating for each. This dual perspective allows me to approach mediations with insight into the priorities and pain points on both sides, facilitating fair, efficient, and practical resolutions.

I understand the frustrations and complexities that often accompany lemon law disputes. My goal as a mediator is to provide a balanced and solutions-driven process that helps parties avoid the expense and uncertainty of litigation. By leveraging my deep knowledge and hands-on experience, I aim to guide cases toward mutually beneficial outcomes.

I offer remote mediation services via video conferencing, providing convenience and accessibility to attorneys and their clients.

If you are involved in a lemon law dispute and are seeking a mediator with in-depth experience and a balanced approach, I would be honored to assist. Please feel free to reach out to discuss how I can support you or to schedule a mediation session.

I look forward to the opportunity to collaborate with you.

Warmly,

Sotera

Schedule a Mediation: https://soteraanderson.com/mediation-calendar/

Starting April 1, 2025, California’s Lemon Law, officially known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, will undergo a significant change that impacts the lemon law deadline for filing a Lemon Law lawsuit. This update alters the rights of California consumers and makes it more important than ever to be aware of your legal options if you believe you have purchased or leased a defective vehicle.

What’s Changing?

The most notable change involves the deadline—or statute of limitations—for filing a Lemon Law lawsuit. Previously, consumers had four years after the expiration of the applicable express warranty to file a lawsuit. Beginning in 2025, this will change to:

1. One year after the applicable express warranty expires, but
2. No more than six years from the date the vehicle was originally delivered to the buyer or lessee.

Why Is This Change Significant?

This shift places stricter limitations on when consumers can take legal action against a manufacturer, particularly for when defects become apparent later in the vehicle’s life. This revision drastically shortens the window to file a lawsuit for many consumers, depending on the length of their warranty. For example:

• If your vehicle has a 5-year/60,000-mile warranty, you now only have 1 year after that warranty expires to bring a claim, instead of 4 years.
• If your defect arises later in your vehicle’s life, you may still be barred from filing a claim if more than 6 years have passed since the vehicle’s delivery.

This could mean that some consumers may lose their ability to recover for legitimate vehicle defects if they delay in identifying and addressing their claims.

For example, if you bought a new 2023 Ford Bronco, one of the warranties you received was a 5 year/60,000 mile powertrain warranty.  If you experienced multiple powertrain problems, you would have to file your lawsuit before the 6 year anniversary of your purchase (1 year after the warranty expired, but no more than 6 years from purchase)

If you purchased a new 2023 Kia Sportage, one of the warranties you received was a 10 year / 100,000 mile powertrain warranty.  If you experienced multiple powertrain problems, you would have to file your lawsuit before the 6 year anniversary of your purchase (even though the powertrain warranty has not even expired yet). (sucks, I know.)

What Does This Mean for Consumers?

The new deadline is a double-edged sword for consumers. On one hand, it places increased urgency on identifying defects and pursuing legal claims promptly. On the other, it reduces flexibility, especially for consumers who may not immediately notice or experience the full impact of a defect until after several years of ownership.

For consumers who want to protect their rights, it is essential to take action as soon as they notice an issue with their vehicle. Waiting too long, even if the defect seems minor at first, could mean losing the opportunity to hold the manufacturer accountable.

What Should You Do If You Suspect Your Vehicle Is a Lemon?

Given these changes, here are some tips for navigating the new rules effectively:

1. Act Quickly: As soon as you notice recurring problems or defects in your vehicle, document them thoroughly. Keep all service records, repair invoices, and communications with the dealer or manufacturer.
2. Understand Your Warranty: Know the length and terms of your express warranty. This information will determine the deadline for filing a Lemon Law claim.
3. Consult a Lemon Law Attorney Early: Filing a Lemon Law claim can be complicated, and the new deadlines make timing even more critical. A skilled attorney can help you assess your case, navigate the legal process, and ensure you meet the new deadlines.

Why This Change Could Benefit Manufacturers

While the change tightens deadlines for consumers, it also limits the manufacturer’s liability exposure by reducing the timeframe in which claims can be brought. This gives manufacturers greater predictability in defending Lemon Law cases and may even reduce the number of lawsuits filed overall.

Final Thoughts

The changes to California’s Lemon Law coming in January 2025 represent a significant shift for consumers and their ability to hold manufacturers accountable for defective vehicles. If you’re experiencing issues with your car, don’t wait—the shortened timeline to file a lawsuit makes early action more crucial than ever.

As a California Lemon Law attorney, I’m here to help you understand your rights and take timely action to get the resolution you deserve. Contact me today for a free consultation if you believe your vehicle is a lemon. Together, we can make sure you don’t miss your chance to fight for justice under this new law.

If you’re facing car problems and suspect your vehicle may be a lemon, contact our experienced Lemon Law attorneys today for a free consultation. We are dedicated to protecting your rights and helping you seek justice in your lemon law case.

Free Quiz: click HERE

Phone: 855-965-3666

Free Case Evaluation: Email the purchase contract and all of the repair records to Info@calemonlawattorney.com

Disclaimer: This blog article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date information regarding the lemon law in your jurisdiction, consult with a qualified attorney.

Earlier this year, the California Supreme Court issued a pivotal ruling in the case of Niedermeier v. FCA, addressing the issue of whether consumers who sell or trade in their defective vehicles should have their lemon law refund reduced by the amount received from the transaction. The Answer: No.

This ruling is significant as it resolves a longstanding conflict within California’s appellate courts. Previously, in Niedermeier v. FCA, the California Court of Appeal held that a consumer’s refund should be reduced by the trade-in or sale value they received for their defective vehicle. The Court of Appeal’s rationale was that under the lemon law (Section 1793.2(d)(2)(B) of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act), the term “restitution” aimed to return the consumer to the financial position they would have been in had they not purchased the defective vehicle, thereby avoiding any potential “windfall” for the consumer. The Court also expressed concern that allowing full restitution without reduction could lead to more defective vehicles being reintroduced into the market, circumventing the Lemon Law’s labeling and notification requirements.

In contrast, other appellate courts disagreed with this approach, arguing that reducing restitution unfairly diminishes the manufacturer’s accountability. In Figueroa v FCA, the Second Appellate District argued that reducing a consumer’s restitution undermines the manufacturer’s liability and does not align with the lemon law’s purpose of robust consumer protection.

In its final decision, the California Supreme Court sided with the latter viewpoint, ruling that the lemon law’s plain language does not support reducing restitution by the trade-in or sale value of the defective vehicle. The Court emphasized that the law’s restitution formula is specific, with enumerated exceptions that do not include offsets for trade-in or sale values. The lemon law defines restitution simply as “the actual price paid or payable,” and the Court found no legislative intent to suggest otherwise. Furthermore, the Court highlighted that public policy considerations support this interpretation. Reducing restitution could incentivize manufacturers to delay addressing defects, hoping consumers would eventually sell or trade in their vehicles to avoid further inconvenience.

The ruling represents a significant strengthening of California’s Lemon Law protections. It ensures that consumers who sell or trade in their defective vehicles due to a manufacturer’s inaction are not penalized when seeking restitution. This outcome may empower more consumers to pursue Lemon Law claims without the fear of losing financial recovery due to a necessary trade-in or sale.

In conclusion, the California Supreme Court’s ruling marks a crucial victory for consumers, reinforcing the protective intent of the lemon law (Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act). It reaffirms that manufacturers should bear the financial consequences when they fail to rectify vehicle defects, ensuring that consumers are not left to shoulder the burden of a faulty product. As California’s Lemon Law continues to evolve, consumers can take solace in the fact that their rights are being upheld and strengthened in the face of manufacturer misconduct.

If you’re facing car problems and suspect your vehicle may be a lemon, contact our experienced Lemon Law attorneys today for a free consultation. We are dedicated to protecting your rights and helping you seek justice in your lemon law case.

Free Quiz: click HERE

Phone: 855-965-3666

Free Case Evaluation: Email the purchase contract and all of the repair records to Info@calemonlawattorney.com

Disclaimer: This blog article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date information regarding the lemon law in your jurisdiction, consult with a qualified attorney.

California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, commonly known as the Lemon Law, stands as one of the most robust consumer protection laws in the United States. This law requires automobile manufacturers to repurchase or replace vehicles that fail to meet certain standards after a reasonable number of repair attempts. While the law is clear in its intent to protect consumers, a recent court decision has called into question whether used cars with remaining portions of the manufacturer’s new vehicle warranty are covered under this important legislation. This article explores the potential impact of the court’s ruling and why the California Supreme Court should reaffirm the protections that have been in place for decades.

The Issue at Hand: Lemon Law Coverage for Used Vehicles

Traditionally, used vehicles purchased with the remainder of the manufacturer’s new vehicle warranty have been considered “new motor vehicles” under the Song-Beverly. This interpretation, supported by the landmark case Jensen v. BMW of North America, Inc. (1995), has provided critical protection to consumers who purchase used vehicles still under the original manufacturer’s warranty. Song-Beverly’s definition of a “new motor vehicle” includes “other motor vehicles sold with a manufacturer’s new car warranty,” which has been understood to extend Lemon Law protections to these used vehicles.

However, a recent case, Rodriguez v. FCA US, LLC (2022), threatens to overturn this long-standing precedent. The plaintiffs in Rodriguez purchased a used vehicle with a remaining balance on its powertrain warranty. After multiple attempts to repair the vehicle’s persistent issues, the plaintiffs sought relief under Song-Beverly. The trial court, however, ruled in favor of FCA, determining that a used vehicle with some remaining warranty is not covered under the Lemon Law’s “new motor vehicle” provision. This decision was later upheld by the Court of Appeal, setting a troubling precedent that could leave countless consumers unprotected.

The Implications of Rodriguez

The Rodriguez decision represents a significant departure from the pro-consumer interpretation established in Jensen. By narrowing the scope of what constitutes a “new motor vehicle,” the ruling effectively strips away Lemon Law protections for buyers of used vehicles with remaining manufacturer warranties. This not only undermines consumer confidence but also exposes Californians to potential financial losses and safety risks.

The implications of this decision are far-reaching. If left to stand, Rodriguez could deny thousands of California consumers the legal recourse they have relied on for decades. Without the protections afforded by Song-Beverly, buyers of used vehicles would have little recourse if they discover that their purchase is plagued by defects.

A Hopeful Development: The Stiles Decision

In a hopeful turn of events, California’s Second District Court of Appeal recently addressed the same issue and opted to reject the reasoning of Rodriguez. In Stiles v. Kia Motors America, Inc. (2024), the court reaffirmed the interpretation established in Jensen, holding that the phrase “other motor vehicles sold with a manufacturer’s new car warranty” should be read broadly to include used vehicles with remaining warranty coverage. The court criticized the narrow interpretation in Rodriguez as inconsistent with both the grammatical structure of the statute and its underlying public policy goals.

The Stiles decision underscores the importance of maintaining the original intent of Song-Beverly, which is to provide robust protections for California consumers. By recognizing that used vehicles sold with a manufacturer’s new car warranty are entitled to the same protections as new vehicles, the court in Stiles preserved the integrity of the Lemon Law and ensured that consumers continue to have access to important legal remedies.

The Path Forward: The Role of the California Supreme Court

As the Rodriguez case awaits review by the California Supreme Court (oral argument is set for September 4, the stakes could not be higher for consumers across the state. A decision to reverse Rodriguez and uphold the broader interpretation of Song-Beverly would reaffirm California’s commitment to consumer protection. It would also ensure that the Lemon Law continues to serve its essential purpose of promoting public safety and financial fairness.

By following the reasoning of Jensen and Stiles, the Supreme Court has the opportunity to safeguard the rights of used vehicle purchasers and to prevent defective vehicles from remaining on California’s roads. Such a decision would have profound implications for consumer protection, preserving the legal remedies that have protected Californians for over 30 years.

Conclusion 

The Rodriguez decision poses a significant threat to the rights of California consumers who purchase used vehicles. However, recent developments in the Stiles case provide a glimmer of hope that the California Supreme Court will ultimately uphold the protections enshrined in the Song-Beverly Act. As we await the Court’s decision, it is crucial to recognize the importance of maintaining strong consumer protection laws that hold manufacturers accountable and ensure that all Californians have access to safe and reliable vehicles.

If you believe you have purchased a used vehicle that may qualify as a lemon, it is essential to seek legal advice as soon as possible. The complexities of Lemon Law cases require the expertise of an attorney who can navigate the legal landscape and help you obtain the compensation you deserve. Contact Sotera Anderson, a Lemon Law attorney, today to discuss your case and protect your rights as a consumer.

If you’re facing car problems and suspect your vehicle may be a lemon, contact our experienced Lemon Law attorneys today for a free consultation. We are dedicated to protecting your rights and helping you seek justice in your lemon law case.

Free Quiz: click HERE

Phone: 855-965-3666

Free Case Evaluation: Email the purchase contract and all of the repair records to Info@calemonlawattorney.com

Disclaimer: This blog article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date information regarding the lemon law in your jurisdiction, consult with a qualified attorney.

Owning a Ford Ranger should be an adventure, offering reliability and performance on and off the road. However, for some owners, the experience has been marred by persistent and frustrating issues. If your Ford Ranger is plagued by problems like stalling, overheating, loss of power, transmission slips, or hesitation, you might be dealing with a lemon.

Common Issues with the Ford Ranger

Many Ford Ranger owners have reported the following issues, which can severely impact the vehicle’s performance and safety:

1. Stalling: Unexpected engine stalling can be dangerous, especially in traffic or while driving at higher speeds. This issue is a major concern for many Ranger owners.
2. Overheating: Overheating problems can lead to engine damage and costly repairs. If your Ranger frequently overheats, it’s a sign of a significant defect.
3. Loss of Power: Experiencing a sudden loss of power can be alarming and is a common complaint among Ranger drivers. This issue affects the vehicle’s reliability and performance.
4. Transmission Slips: Transmission slips can cause your vehicle to unexpectedly change gears, which is both frustrating and potentially hazardous.
5. Transmission Hesitation: Hesitation in the transmission when accelerating can lead to unsafe driving conditions and overall dissatisfaction with the vehicle’s performance.

Understanding Your Rights

As a consumer, you have rights under California’s Lemon Law, which protects buyers and lessees of vehicles with significant defects that impair their use, value, or safety. If your Ford Ranger has been in the shop repeatedly for the same issues or has been out of service for an extended period, it might qualify as a lemon.

How a Lemon Law Attorney Can Help

While it’s possible to pursue a Lemon Law claim on your own, having an experienced attorney can make a significant difference. Here’s how a Lemon Law attorney can assist you:

1. Case Evaluation: An attorney will thoroughly review the history of your Ford Ranger to determine if it meets the criteria for a Lemon Law claim. They will assess the severity and frequency of the issues and advise you on the best course of action.
2. Expert Negotiation: With their knowledge of Lemon Law requirements and experience dealing with manufacturers, attorneys are skilled at negotiating the best possible outcome. This could include a refund, a replacement vehicle, or a cash settlement.
3. No Upfront Costs: In most cases, you won’t have to pay your Lemon Law attorney out of pocket. The law stipulates that the manufacturer must cover attorney fees if the claim is successful, allowing you to benefit from expert legal representation without the financial burden.

Take Action Now

If your Ford Ranger is experiencing stalling, overheating, loss of power, transmission slips, or hesitation, it’s time to take action. Don’t let these issues continue to disrupt your driving experience and compromise your safety.

Contact Lemon Law Attorney Sotera Anderson Today

Don’t face these challenges alone. Contact me, a Lemon Law attorney specializing in automotive defects, to help you navigate the legal process and get the compensation you deserve. Together, we can hold Ford accountable and ensure you get your money back or a reliable replacement vehicle. Your satisfaction and safety are our top priorities.

Conclusion

Owning a defective vehicle like the Ford Ranger can be frustrating and stressful. But you don’t have to deal with it alone. By seeking the assistance of a skilled Lemon Law attorney, you can protect your rights and achieve a favorable resolution. Reach out today to start your journey towards reclaiming your peace of mind on the road.

If you’re facing car problems and suspect your vehicle may be a lemon, contact our experienced Lemon Law attorneys today for a free consultation. We are dedicated to protecting your rights and helping you seek justice in your lemon law case.

Free Quiz: click HERE

Phone: 855-965-3666

Free Case Evaluation: Email the purchase contract and all of the repair records to Info@calemonlawattorney.com

Disclaimer: This blog article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date information regarding the lemon law in your jurisdiction, consult with a qualified attorney.

Are you considering pursuing a Lemon Law claim in California but wondering if you really need a lawyer? Lemon Law Lawyer Help — While it’s not mandatory to have legal representation, having a skilled attorney by your side can make a world of difference. Here’s why:

1. Lemon Law Lawyer Help – Not Required, But Incredibly Helpful

First things first, let’s address the elephant in the room: You are not legally required to hire a lawyer to pursue a Lemon Law claim. However, having one can significantly enhance your chances of success and ensure you receive the best possible outcome.

2. Benefit of Skilled Representation

A skilled Lemon Law attorney brings valuable expertise to the table. They will meticulously review the details of your vehicle’s history to determine if it meets the Lemon Law criteria. This thorough analysis is crucial for building a strong case.

3. Negotiating Power

One of the most significant advantages of hiring a Lemon Law attorney is their ability to negotiate on your behalf. With their knowledge of what the Lemon Law requires and their experience dealing with manufacturers, attorneys are adept at securing the best possible deal for their clients.

4. No Upfront Costs for Consumers

Here’s the best part: Consumers typically don’t have to pay their Lemon Law attorney out of pocket. The Lemon Law stipulates that the manufacturer is responsible for covering attorney fees if the claim is successful. This means you can benefit from experienced legal representation without worrying about upfront costs.

5. Access to Experience

When you hire a Lemon Law attorney, you’re gaining access to their years of experience handling similar cases. This experience can be invaluable in navigating the complexities of the legal process and ensuring your rights are protected every step of the way.

In conclusion, while it’s technically possible to pursue a California Lemon Law claim without a lawyer, it’s not advisable. With so much at stake, having skilled legal representation can make all the difference in the outcome of your case. Don’t hesitate to reach out to a qualified Lemon Law attorney who can guide you through the process and fight for the compensation you deserve.

If you’re facing car problems and suspect your vehicle may be a lemon, contact our experienced Lemon Law attorneys today for a free consultation. We are dedicated to protecting your rights and helping you seek justice in your lemon law case.

Free Quiz: click HERE

Phone: 855-965-3666

Free Case Evaluation: Email purchase contract and repair records to Info@calemonlawattorney.com

Disclaimer: This blog article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date information regarding the lemon law in your jurisdiction, consult with a qualified attorney.

As a Lemon Law attorney in California, I often encounter a common question from consumers: How long does the Lemon Law process take? It’s a reasonable concern, and the Leon Law timing factors can vary. Let’s delve into what influences the duration and what consumers can expect as they navigate this process.

1. Lemon Law Timing Factor: A Range of Timelines

The Lemon Law process, from filing a claim to resolution, is not one-size-fits-all. Typical cases can take anywhere from 45 days to 6 months, but variations exist. Some cases might extend beyond this timeframe, influenced by several factors.

2. Manufacturer’s Attorney’s Pace

A significant factor impacting the process is the pace at which the manufacturer’s attorney handles the case. The workload they manage, the number of cases they’re juggling, and their responsiveness play crucial roles. A busier schedule for the manufacturer’s attorney might extend the timeline.

3. Lemon Law Timing Factor: Strength of the Vehicle’s History

The strength of your vehicle’s history is pivotal. If the issues are well-documented with a clear pattern of defects and repair attempts, it can expedite the process. A robust case history provides a compelling argument for a lemon law claim.

4. Lemon Law Timing Factor: Legal Procedures and Requirements

Specific legal procedures and requirements are inherent in the Lemon Law process. This includes the formalities of filing and responding to legal documents. Adhering to these procedures is necessary, and the pace at which they unfold contributes to the overall timeline.

5. Our Commitment to Timeliness

On our end, as Lemon Law attorneys, we are committed to moving the case forward in a timely manner. We understand the urgency and frustration that comes with persistent vehicle issues. We work diligently to ensure that your case progresses efficiently and effectively. If the case is not moving, it is not because our office isn’t doing something.  We are always the one waiting on the other side or the Court or legal timelines.

6. Communication is Key

Throughout the process, open and clear communication is paramount. We keep our clients informed about the status of their case, updates on any developments, and what to expect in the coming stages. This transparency helps manage expectations and provides reassurance.

7. Be Patient, But Stay Informed

While patience is crucial, we encourage our clients to stay informed and engaged in the process. Knowing the general timeline, understanding potential delays, and being proactive in providing necessary documentation can contribute to a smoother process.

8. Personalized Attention to Your Case

Every case is unique, and we provide personalized attention to each client. Understanding the specific details of your situation allows us to tailor our approach, ensuring that your case receives the focus it deserves.

Conclusion

Navigating the Lemon Law process in California involves a blend of legal procedures, responsiveness from the manufacturer’s attorney, and the strength of your vehicle’s history. While there’s a general timeline, variations exist based on these factors. As your Lemon Law attorney, we are committed to moving your case forward efficiently. Stay informed, be patient, and rest assured that we are working tirelessly to secure a resolution to your case.

If you’re facing car problems and suspect your vehicle may be a lemon, contact our experienced Lemon Law attorneys today for a free consultation. We are dedicated to protecting your rights and helping you seek justice in your lemon law case.

Free Quiz: click HERE

Phone: 855-965-3666

Free Case Evaluation: Email purchase contract and repair records to Info@calemonlawattorney.com

Disclaimer: This blog article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date information regarding the lemon law in your jurisdiction, consult with a qualified attorney.